Research Article

Serial Entrepreneurship: Learning by Doing?

Francine Lafontaine, Kathryn Shaw

GAICIL Insights

Forget the garage startup.1 Most entrepreneurship happens at the hair salon, the repair shop and the corner restaurant. Serial Entrepreneurship: Learning by Doing?, by Francine Lafontaine and Kathryn Shaw, studies that everyday economy and asks whether business experience makes owners better at it. The data cover all establishments started between 1990 and 2011 to sell retail goods and services in Texas. An entrepreneur is the owner of a new business; a serial entrepreneur opens repeat businesses.

The answer is yes, and measurably. Serial entrepreneurs operate 25.6% of businesses. Their businesses last longer: prior experience increases the longevity of the next business opened. If the owner of a new establishment has owned one prior business, the probability of exit for that establishment falls by 7 percent. Results with owner fixed effects suggest past experience imparts valuable business skills. Entrepreneurs learn by doing.

The setting gives the result unusual weight. Small retail entrepreneurs may create fewer jobs per business than large technology entrepreneurs, yet small retail matters because there are so many establishments. Across Texas retail from 1990 to 2011, small owners founded 2.33 million establishments, a count that includes 46,000 small-owner establishments affiliated with national chains through franchising. Large owners, defined as those with 21 or more establishments in the data period, open only 120,000. Restaurants, standard retail stores, repair shops, hair salons: this is entrepreneurship as most people encounter it.

Now introduce artificial intelligence as a substitute teacher. Small business owners increasingly have AI tools for inventory management, pricing, marketing and customer service. Those tools can partly replace the experience serial entrepreneurs gain the hard way. A first-time owner with AI-driven analytics may dodge mistakes that would otherwise be learned only through failure. If AI compresses the learning curve, first businesses could survive longer and the gap between novices and veterans could narrow. The tuition of failure gets cheaper.

Experience will not lose its value, though. Owner fixed effects show skills accumulate within individuals through running businesses. AI may complement those skills, letting experienced owners manage more effectively. Human experience plus AI assistance could make serial entrepreneurs even more productive. The veteran with the new tool may be the most formidable small-business owner the economy has seen.

An unexpected pattern opens a further possibility. Serial entrepreneurship is not especially prevalent in this sector, the authors note, possibly because most retail owners are small proprietors unable to maintain more than one business at a time. AI might relax that constraint. By lightening the managerial burden of each establishment, it could let small owners run several businesses at once, widening the scope for learning across ventures. The one-shop owner could become a three-shop owner.

Policy implications point to the revolving door of business life. If experience raises the longevity of subsequent businesses, barriers to re-entry after failure impose a real cost by discouraging experienced entrepreneurs from trying again. Licensing requirements, compliance costs and bankruptcy rules all shape how easily owners can start anew. Simplifying them lets the economy harvest the skills entrepreneurs accumulate. Every unnecessary license fee is a small tax on learning.

The data infrastructure deserves recognition. The Texas records cover all retail establishments over two decades, letting the authors track owners across businesses and measure returns to experience precisely. Comparable data elsewhere would let policymakers evaluate how AI adoption affects business survival and the returns to experience, an obvious research priority as AI reaches Main Street.

Pulled together, entrepreneurship is a craft developed through practice. Serial entrepreneurs run more durable businesses because they have learned from earlier ones. AI may speed that learning, extend it to first-time owners and let experienced owners do more. Policies that keep the doors of entry open, and let owners try again after failure, ensure that accumulated entrepreneurial skill, amplified by new tools, keeps powering growth across the many small businesses that make up the economy.

A closing challenge: the biggest AI productivity story of the decade might unfold far from Silicon Valley, in thousands of small shops whose owners suddenly have a strategist in their pocket.

Introduction

Among typical entrepreneurs, is serial entrepreneurship common? Is the serial entrepreneur more likely to succeed? If so, why? These questions are addressed using data on all establishments started between 1990 and 2011 to sell retail goods and services in Texas. An entrepreneur is the owner of a new business. A serial entrepreneur is one who opens repeat businesses. We find that 25.6% of businesses are operated by serial entrepreneurs. These are the more successful businesses: prior business experience increases the longevity of the next business opened. Results with owner fixed effects suggest that past experience imparts valuable business skills.

Takeaway

Entrepreneurship is often described as an engine of growth. Entrepreneurs start new businesses, which raise employment and GDP. Small retail entrepreneurs may create fewer jobs per business than large tech entrepreneurs, but small retail is economically important because there are so many establishments. We study all retail businesses in the state of Texas from 1990 to 2011, and during that time there are 2.33 million retail establishments founded in the state by small owners. This includes 46,000 establishments of small owners that are affiliated with national chains via franchising. Large owners (those that have 21 or more establishments in the data period) open only 120,000 establishments, half of which are associated with national brands. The businesses of small owners may be short-lived – the mean duration of these businesses is 3.33 years, with a median of 2 years – but they are prevalent. The establishments in these data span the activities of a broadly defined retail sector – from restaurants, to standard retail stores, to repair shops and hair salons. Among the businesses founded between 1990 and 2011, there are, for example, almost 250 thousand restaurants. Among small business owners, serial entrepreneurs are more successful. If the owner of a new establishment has owned one prior business, the probability of exit for that new establishment falls by 7 percent. Serial entrepreneurship, however, is not so prevalent in this sector: among our retail establishments of small owners in Texas, 25.5 percent only are owned by those with at least one prior business.1

These data show an unexpected pattern underlying serial entrepreneurship for small business owners in retail. The more successful of these owners are those that open a business, close the business, and then open another one.

That is, the new business that they open is more likely to survive if their previous business has been closed than if their previous business remains open.

Ownership is sequential. This could be a feature of retail ownership – where most owners are small proprietors and therefore unable to maintain more than one business at a time.

Article

Notes

  1. Francine Lafontaine & Kathryn Shaw, Serial Entrepreneurship: Learning by Doing?, 34 J. Lab. Econ. S217 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1086/683820. Takeaway source: Conclusion, reproduced from a free author or repository copy (working-paper version). ↩

Cite as: Francine Lafontaine & Kathryn Shaw, Serial Entrepreneurship: Learning by Doing?, 34 J. Lab. Econ. S217 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1086/683820

Header image: A Seasons 52 restaurant at The Summit in Birmingham, Alabama 02.jpg by Harrison Keely, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

© 2026 Global AI Competition & Innovation Lab

© 2026 Global AI Competition & Innovation Lab

© 2026 Global AI Competition & Innovation Lab